Hirarki Pengetahuan dalam Taksonomi Bloom, Higher Order Thinking Skills dan Al-Ghazali: Kajian Epistemologi Pendidikan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66957/514xrv33Keywords:
Epistemologi Al-Ghazali, Hirarki Pengetahuan Taksonomi Bloom, Higher Order Thinking SkillsAbstract
Domain kognitif taksonomi Bloom ini sangat sering digunakan sebagai kerangka kerja untuk pengkategorian tujuan pembelajaran, tes, dan merancang kurikulum. Urutan taksonomi tersebut meliputi: (1) pengetahuan, (2) pemahaman, (3) penerapan, (4) analisis, (5) sintesis, dan (6) evaluasi. Perintah tersebut telah digunakan lebih dari lima puluh tahun sebagai dasar untuk tujuan pembelajaran, merancang tes dan kurikulum. Kurikulum Merdeka berbasis Higher Order Thinking Skills dibagi menjadi tiga bagian: (1) Higher-Order Thinking as Transfer (2) Higher-Order Thinking Critical Thinking and (3) Higher-Order Thinking as Problem Solving. Sarana pencapaian pengetahuan menurut Al-Ghazali ada tiga yakni: (1). Pancaindra (2). Akal dan (3). Intuisi (Zauq atau Wijdan).
Kata kunci: Taksonomi Bloom, Higher Order Thinking Skills, Pancaindra, Akal dan Intuisi
References
Aba-Oli. Z.. Koyas. K.. & Husen. A. (2025). Higher-order thinking skills-oriented problem-based learning interventions in mathematics: A systematic literature review. School Science and Mathematics. 125(3). 214–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12676
Adams. N. E. (2015). Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive learning objectives. Journal of the Medical Library Association. 103(3). 152–153. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.103.3.010
Ademi. A. (2022). The light of intellect and spiritual vision in al-Ghazali’s Mishkat al-Anwar [Master’s thesis. Istanbul Hazar University]. Istanbul Hazar University Open Access Repository.
Akbar. R. M.. & Soleh. A. K. (2025). The classification of knowledge based on Al-Ghazali's perspective and its relevance to Qur’anic exegesis. FITUA: Jurnal Studi Islam. 6(2). https://doi.org/10.47625/fitua.v6i2.1066
Al-Ghazali. (1998). The niche of lights (Mishkat al-Anwar) (D. Buchman. Trans.). Brigham Young University Press.
Al-Ghazali. (2000). The deliverance from error (Al-Munqidh min al-Dalal) (W. M. Watt. Trans.). Islamic Book Trust.
Anam. A. (2022). Konsep ilmu menurut Al-Ghazali perspektif filosofis: Aspek ontologi. epistemologi. aksiologi. PROGRESSA: Journal of Islamic Religious Instruction. 6(2). 19–36. https://doi.org/10.32616/pgr.v6.2.420.19-36
Anderson. L. W.. & Krathwohl. D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning. teaching. and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
Ariyana. Y.. Pudjiastuti. A.. Bestary. R.. & Zamroni. (2018). Buku pegangan pembelajaran berorientasi pada keterampilan berpikir tingkat tinggi: Program peningkatan kompetensi pembelajaran berbasis zonasi. Direktorat Jenderal Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Athanassiou. N.. McNett. J. M.. & Harvey. C. (2003). Critical thinking in the management classroom: Bloom’s taxonomy as a learning tool. Journal of Management Education. 27(5). 533–555. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562903252515
Bloom. B. S.. Engelhart. M. D.. Furst. E. J.. Hill. W. H.. & Krathwohl. D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. Longmans. Green.
Brookhart. S. M. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. ASCD.
De Wever. B.. Van Keer. H.. Schellens. T.. & Valcke. M. (2009). Supporting active cognitive processing in collaborative groups: The potential of Bloom's taxonomy as a labeling tool. The Internet and Higher Education. 12(3–4). 165–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.08.003
Fadhil. M. Y.. & Sebgag. S. (2021). Sufi approaches to education: The epistemology of Imam Al-Ghazali. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam. 4(1). 91–107. https://doi.org/10.31538/nzh.v4i1.834
Frank. R. M. (1992). Creation and the cosmic system: Al-Ghazālī & Avicenna. Winter.
Ghazali. M. B. (2001). Epistemologi Al-Ghazali. Al Qalam. 18(90–91). https://doi.org/10.32678/alqalam.v18i90-91.1469
Ghozali. M. (2015). Hermeneutika sufistik al-Ghazâlî dalam Mishkât al-Anwâr. Mutawâtir: Jurnal Keilmuan Tafsir Hadis. 5(1). 50–73. https://doi.org/10.15642/mutawatir.2015.5.1.50-73
Hasan. A. (2012). Menyusuri hakikat kebenaran: Kajian epistemologi atas konsep intuisi dalam tasawuf al-Ghazali. At-Ta'dib. 7(2). https://doi.org/10.21111/at-tadib.v7i2.71
Hasib. K.. Zarkasyi. A. F.. & Muslih. M. K. (2024). Intuition according to Imam al-Ghazali and its role as methods of acquiring knowledge. Kalam. 18(1). 81–106. https://doi.org/10.24042/002024181880100
Muhsinin. M.. Sahni. S.. Ariawan. S.. & Hamdi. M. Z. (2025). Content analysis of thinking skills level in reading questions of tenth grade of EFL textbook in Indonesia. Journal of English Language Teaching Innovations and Materials. 7(1). https://doi.org/10.26418/jeltim.v7i1.60800
Muliawan. C.. & Normuslim. (2025). Perbandingan epistemologi Al-Ghazali. Ibnu Sina. dan Ibnu Rusyd: Antara intuisi. rasio. dan empiris. JIS: Journal Islamic Studies. 3(3). 366–373. https://doi.org/10.71456/jis.v3i3.1538
Nasution. M. Y. (2001). Telaah signifikansi konsep manusia menurut Al-Ghazali. MIQOT: Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Keislaman. 35(2). https://doi.org/10.30821/miqot.v35i2.141
Page. M. J.. McKenzie. J. E.. Bossuyt. P. M.. et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Parwata. I. G. A. L.. Jayanta. I. N. L.. & Widiana. I. W. (2023). Improving metacognitive ability and learning outcomes with problem-based revised Bloom's taxonomy oriented learning activities. Emerging Science Journal. 7(2). 569–577. https://doi.org/10.28991/ESJ-2023-07-02-019
Qomusuddin. I. F.. Hariyanto. T.. & Sam'un. (2025). Science. heart. and the senses: A study of Imam Al-Ghazali's thought. Al-Mujaddid: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Agama. 7(2). 111–120. https://doi.org/10.51482/almujaddid.v7i2.134
Renaldi. A. (2025). Al-Ghazali's intuitive epistemology: A critique of Western epistemology. Indonesian Journal of Interdisciplinary Research in Science and Technology. 3(6). 675–694. https://doi.org/10.55927/marcopolo.v3i6.78
Sabir. A.. Suyitno. I.. Susanto. G.. & Inthase. W. (2024). The unlocking higher-order thinking: Bloom's taxonomy and teacher questions in Indonesian language instruction. Lentera Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan. 27(1). 78–100. https://doi.org/10.24252/lp.2024v27n1i6
Sagala. P. N.. & Andriani. A. (2019). Development of higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) questions of probability theory subject based on Bloom’s taxonomy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 1188(1). 012025. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1188/1/012025
Samo. D. D. (2017). Pre-service mathematics teachers' conception of higher-order thinking level in Bloom's taxonomy. Infinity Journal. 6(2). 121–136. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v6i2.p121-136
Situating higher-order. critical. and critical-analytic thinking in problem- and project-based learning environments: A systematic review. (2023). Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10648-023-09757-X
Snyder. H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research. 104. 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Torraco. R. J. (2016). Writing integrative literature reviews: Using the past and present to explore the future. Human Resource Development Review. 15(4). 404–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484316671606
Whittemore. R.. & Knafl. K. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 52(5). 546–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x
