Interactive Reading Model in Enhancing Arabic Learners’ Reading Comprehension: Evidence from Islamic Boarding Schools
Keywords:
Interactive reading, Arabic reading comprehension, Pondok pesantren, Reading strategiesAbstract
Arabic reading comprehension requires more than word recognition because learners must manage morphological density, syntactic flexibility, and frequent omission of short vowels (harakāt), which can increase ambiguity and cognitive load. Therefore, this study investigates the efficacy of an interactive reading model in improving Arabic reading comprehension among students in an Indonesian pondok pesantren and examines how learners experience and negotiate reading difficulties during interactive reading. Using a qualitative case study design, the research involved 25 pesantren students who had studied Arabic for one to two years. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and classroom observations to capture both students’ perceptions and their observable reading behaviors across pre-reading, while-reading, and post-reading phases. Thematic analysis was applied through iterative coding, codebook refinement, and category development to generate themes describing comprehension development, breakdown-and-repair processes, and cross-language differences in reading strategies. Findings indicate that interactive reading shifted students from predominantly word-for-word translation toward more meaning-oriented comprehension. Students reported improved ability to identify main ideas, select relevant details, and track cohesion through pronoun reference and discourse markers. Confidence in reading unvowelled texts increased because interactive routines normalized uncertainty and enabled collaborative clarification. When comprehension broke down, students commonly employed repair moves such as rereading for context, testing root-pattern clues, consulting peers, and seeking teacher scaffolding for confirmation. Compared with Indonesian reading, Arabic comprehension was slower and more form-focused, making rapid skimming and automatic inferencing difficult; however, interactive reading reduced these constraints by supporting negotiation of meaning through dialogue. The study contributes a context-sensitive account of how interactive reading can be integrated with pesantren literacy traditions to strengthen comprehension processes in classical and unvowelled Arabic texts.
References
Abu-Rabia, S. (2002). Reading in a root-based-morphology language: The case of Arabic. Journal of Research in Reading, 25(3), 299–309. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.00177
Abu-Rabia, S., & Darawshe, E. (2024). Evaluation of the multiple-deficit hypothesis among dyslexic Arabic-speaking children. Dyslexia, 30(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.1759
Al-Thubaity, A., Al-Khalifa, A., Almuhareb, A., & Alsanie, W. (2020). Arabic diacritization using bidirectional long short-term memory neural networks with conditional random fields. IEEE Access, 8, 154984–154996. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3018885
Alsadoon, R., & Heift, T. (2015). Textual input enhancement for vowel blindness: A study with Arabic ESL learners. The Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12188
Alsayadi, H., Abdelhamid, A., Hegazy, I., & Fayed, Z. (2021). Non-diacritized Arabic speech recognition based on CNN-LSTM and attention-based models. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 41(6), 6207–6219. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-202841
Asadi, I., Asli-Badarneh, A., & Vaknin-Nusbaum, V. (2024). The impact of morphological density on reading comprehension in Arabic: A comparison between typically developing children and children with reading disabilities. Dyslexia, 30(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.1761
Balla, A., Bousbia, N., Sakraoui, I., Boudardara, F., Zerrouki, T., & Shquier, M. (2019). Adapting eSpeak to Arabic language: Converting Arabic text to speech language using eSpeak. International Journal of Reasoning-Based Intelligent Systems, 11(1), 76. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJRIS.2019.10019388
Davis, D. (2013). Multiple comprehension strategies instruction in the intermediate grades: Three remarks about content and pedagogy in the intervention literature. Review of Education, 1(2), 194–224. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3005
Devi, A., & Suroto, S. (2024). Explicit reading strategy instruction in an online reading classroom. ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching, 13(2), 125–136. https://doi.org/10.15294/elt.v13i2.1639
Ekawati, D., Hidayat, H., & Rosyada, D. (2024). Enhancing vocabulary, dialogue, and writing skills in Arabic through communicative language teaching: An experimental study. International Journal of Religion, 5(9), 896–907. https://doi.org/10.61707/5880sz57
Hermena, E., Liversedge, S. P., & Drieghe, D. (2016). Parafoveal processing of Arabic diacritical marks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(12), 2021–2038. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000294
Hermena, E., & Reichle, E. D. (2020). Insights from the study of Arabic reading. Language and Linguistics Compass, 14(10), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12400
Jumaily, S. (2023). The impact of Arabic diglossia on L2 learners studying in Iraq: The difficulties encountered and the appropriate Arabic approach to teach. Journal of Biomedical Research & Environmental Sciences, 4(4), 678–692. https://doi.org/10.37871/jbres1725
Midhwah, A., & Alhawary, M. (2020). Arabic diacritics and their role in facilitating reading speed, accuracy, and comprehension by English L2 learners of Arabic. The Modern Language Journal, 104(2), 418–438. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12642
Muhammad, F., & Purbani, W. (2024). The imbalance case in multilingualism practices at pesantren: Students’ voices. Indonesian Journal of Education Pedagogy, 1(1), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.61251/ijoep.v1i1.42
Nasution, M., Harida, E., & Rambe, S. (2019). Improving students’ reading comprehension by using reciprocal teaching in descriptive texts at Grade VIII SMP. Tazkir: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial dan Keislaman, 5(1), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.24952/tazkir.v5i1.1818
Ness, M. (2016). When readers ask questions: Inquiry-based reading instruction. The Reading Teacher, 70(2), 189–196. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1492
Peng, P., Wang, W., Filderman, M., Zhang, W., & Lin, L. (2023). The active ingredient in reading comprehension strategy intervention for struggling readers: A Bayesian network meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 94(2), 228–267. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543231171345
Prasetya, R., & Syarif, A. (2023). ChatGPT as a tool for language development: Investigating its impact on proficiency and self-evaluation accuracy in Indonesian higher education. VELES: Voice of English Language Education Society, 7(3), 402–415. https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v7i3.19303
Pratiwi, D., & Norani, N. (2022). Think-aloud method: Developing students’ reading comprehension. English Education and Applied Linguistics Journal (EEAL Journal), 5(2), 114–127. https://doi.org/10.31980/eealjournal.v5i2.2521
Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2017). MAWRID: A model of Arabic word reading in development. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51(5), 454–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219417720460
Shiekh, A., Azmi, M., Aziz, M., Al-Mhiqani, M., & Bafjaish, S. (2020). Diacritic segmentation technique for Arabic handwritten using region-based. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 18(1), 478–484. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v18.i1.pp478-484
Shiekh, A., Azmi, M., Aziz, M., Al-Mhiqani, M., & Bafjaish, S. (2021). Framework of diacritic segmentation for Arabic handwritten document. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 24(2), 1001–1008. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v24.i2.pp1001-1008
Sudiarti, S., Sarvina, W., & Jannah, N. (2022). Analysis of the role of santri in the development of pesantren business units (Case study of Darunnajah Islamic Boarding School, South Jakarta). Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah Akuntansi dan Perbankan (JESKAPE), 6(2), 237–251. https://doi.org/10.52490/jeskape.v6i2.706
Tham, D., & Sang, N. (2021). Fourth graders’ perceptions of the use of reciprocal teaching model in English reading comprehension. VNU Journal of Science: Education Research, 37(4). https://doi.org/10.25073/2588-1159/vnuer.4537
Ukrainetz, T. A. (2015). Improving text comprehension: Scaffolding adolescents into strategic reading. Seminars in Speech and Language, 36(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1396443
Valencia, S. W., & Pearson, P. D. (1988). Principles for classroom comprehension assessment. Remedial and Special Education, 9(1), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258800900106
Wigfield, A., Guthrie, J. T., Perencevich, K. C., Taboada, A., Klauda, S. L., McRae, A., & Barbosa, P. (2008). Role of reading engagement in mediating effects of reading comprehension instruction on reading outcomes. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 432–445. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20307
Zeroual, I., Kah, A., & Lakhouaja, A. (2017). Gamification for Arabic natural language processing: Ideas into practice. Transactions on Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.14738/tmlai.54.3323




