Pengaruh Model E-Learning Berbasis Web Dan Adversity Quotient Terhadap Hasil Belajar Sains Siswa Slbn Kota Mataram
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66957/4g7aey68Keywords:
e-learning berbasis web, adversity quotient, Hasil Belajar SainsAbstract
Abstract: This study aims to determine the effect of web-based e-learning models and adversity quotient (AQ) on Science learning outcomes. The research was conducted at SLB Negeri Kota Mataram, West Nusa Tenggara, using cluster random sampling to select a sample of 40 students. This study employed a 2 x 2 treatment by level design and was analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The research results show that: (1) the science learning outcomes of the group of students given the web-based e-learning model using multimedia are higher than the science learning outcomes of the group of students given the web-based e-learning model using modules, (2) there is an interaction effect between the web-based e-learning model and adversity quotient (AQ) on students' science learning outcomes, and (3) specifically for the group of students with high adversity quotient (AQ), the science learning outcomes of the group of students given the web-based e-learning model using multimedia are higher than the science learning outcomes of the group of students given the web-based e-learning model using modules. For the group of students with low adversity quotient (AQ), there is no effect on science learning outcomes whether given a web-based e-learning model using multimedia or a web-based e-learning model using modules.
Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menentukan pengaruh model e-learning berbasis web dan kecerdasan adversitas (AQ) terhadap hasil belajar Sains. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan di SLB Negeri Kota Mataram, Nusa Tenggara Barat dengan menggunakan cluster random sampling dalam pengambilan sampel diperoleh 40 siswa. Penelitian ini menggunakan desain treatment by level 2 x 2 dan dianalisa dengan analisis varian (ANAVA) dua jalur. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) hasil belajar Sains kelompok siswa yang diberi model e-learning berbasis web menggunakan multimedia lebih tinggi dari hasil belajar Sains pada kelompok siswa yang diberi model e-learning berbasis web menggunakan modul, (2) terdapat pengaruh interaksi antara model e-learning berbasis web dengan kecerdasan adversitas (AQ) terhadap hasil belajar Sains siswa, dan (3) khusus kelompok siswa yang memiliki kecerdasan adversitas (AQ) tinggi, hasil belajar Sains kelompok siswa yang diberi model e-learning berbasis web menggunakan multimedia lebih tinggi dari hasil belajar Sains kelompok siswa yang diberi model e-learning berbasis web menggunakan modul. Untuk kelompok siswa yang memiliki kecerdasan adversitas (AQ) rendah, tidak terdapat pengaruh pada hasil belajar Sains ketika diberikan model e-learning berbasis web menggunakan multimedia maupun model e-learning berbasis web menggunakan modul.
References
Akinbadewa, B. O., & Sofowora, O. A. (2020). The Effectiveness of Multimedia Instructional Learning Packages in Enhancing Secondary School Students’ Attitudes toward Biology. International Journal on Studies in Education, 2(2), 119–133. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonse.19
Al-Hawari, F., Barham, H., Al-Sawaeer, O., Alshawabkeh, M., Alouneh, S., Daoud, M. I., & Alazrai, R. (2021). Methods to achieve effective web-based learning management modules: MyGJU versus Moodle. PeerJ Computer Science, 7, e498. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.498
Banda, H. J., & Nzabahimana, J. (2023). The Impact of Physics Education Technology (PhET) Interactive Simulation-Based Learning on Motivation and Academic Achievement Among Malawian Physics Students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32(1), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-10010-3
Bansal, N., Tandon, M., & Das, H. (2023). Importance of computer in learning of person with disabilities in skill training. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 16(3), 966–976. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-05-2023-0187
Batmaz, S., Altinoz, A. E., & Sonkurt, H. O. (2021). Cognitive attentional syndrome and metacognitive beliefs as potential treatment targets for metacognitive therapy in bipolar disorder. World Journal of Psychiatry, 11(9), 589–604. https://doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v11.i9.589
Cui, S., Zhang, C., Wang, S., Zhang, X., Wang, L., Zhang, L., Yuan, Q., Huang, C., Cheng, F., Zhang, K., & Zhou, X. (2021). Experiences and attitudes of elementary school students and their parents toward online learning in China during the COVID-19 pandemic: Questionnaire study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(5), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.2196/24496
Fortus, D., & Touitou, I. (2021). Changes to students’ motivation to learn science. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 3(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-020-00029-0
Gavhane, J. M., & Pagare, R. (2024). Artificial intelligence for education and its emphasis on assessment and adversity quotient: a review. Education + Training, 66(6), 609–645. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-04-2023-0117
Hiğde, E., & Aktamış, H. (2022). The effects of STEM activities on students’ STEM career interests, motivation, science process skills, science achievement and views. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 43, 101000. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101000
Johansson, S., Gulliksen, J., & Gustavsson, C. (2021). Disability digital divide: the use of the internet, smartphones, computers and tablets among people with disabilities in Sweden. Universal Access in the Information Society, 20(1), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-020-00714-x
Lambright, K. (2024). The Effect of a Teacher’s Mindset on the Cascading Zones of Proximal Development: A Systematic Review. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 29(3), 1313–1329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-023-09696-0
Li, J., & Wang, R. (2024). RETRACTED ARTICLE: Determining the role of innovative teaching practices, sustainable learning, and the adoption of e-learning tools in leveraging academic motivation for students’ mental well-being. BMC Psychology, 12(1), 163. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01639-3
Lu, L., Ye, C., Xu, R., Feng, H., & Liu, B. (2024). Psychological resilience and perceived stress among Chinese medical students: mediation between optimistic intelligence quotient and adversity quotient. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 1358. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06287-0
Mardiana, D. (2022). Adversity Quotient and the Development of Students’ Endurance Dimensions in the New Normal Era: A Study of Islamic Religious Education Online Learning at the State University of Malang. Jurnal Intelektual: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Studi Keislaman, 12(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.33367/ji.v12i1.2278
McNicholl, A., Casey, H., Desmond, D., & Gallagher, P. (2021). The impact of assistive technology use for students with disabilities in higher education: a systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 16(2), 130–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2019.1642395
Membiela, P., Acosta, K., Yebra, M. A., & González, A. (2023). Motivation to learn science, emotions in science classes, and engagement towards science studies in Chilean and Spanish compulsory secondary education students. Science Education, 107(4), 939–963. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21793
Mohammed Ali, Alkahtani. (2021). E-learning for Students With Disabilities During COVID-19: Faculty Attitude and Perception. Sage Open, 11(4), 21582440211054496. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211054494
Pong, H. K., & Lam, P. (2023). The Effect of Service Learning on the Development of Trait Emotional Intelligence and Adversity Quotient in Youths: An Experimental Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20064677
Sanchez-Gordon, S., Aguilar-Mayanquer, C., & Calle-Jimenez, T. (2021). Model for Profiling Users With Disabilities on e-Learning Platforms. IEEE Access, 9, 74258–74274. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3081061
Selvaraj, A., Radhin, V., KA, N., Benson, N., & Mathew, A. J. (2021). Effect of pandemic based online education on teaching and learning system. International Journal of Educational Development, 85, 102444. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102444
Solehuddin, M., Sopandi, E., Saputra, D. G., Dhaniswara, E., Yulianto, S., Wei, Z., & Xu, S. (2023). Development of Adaptive E-Learning Content to Increase Learning Effectiveness. Journal International Inspire Education Technology, 2(2), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.55849/jiiet.v2i2.457
Ssemugenyi, F., & Sali, G. (2025). Reassessing technology-enhanced learning: Striking a balance between technological integration and pedagogical effectiveness. International Journal of Education and Practice, 13(4), 1424–1442. https://doi.org/10.18488/61.v13i4.4466
Stecuła, K., & Wolniak, R. (2022). Advantages and Disadvantages of E-Learning Innovations during COVID-19 Pandemic in Higher Education in Poland. In Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity (Vol. 8, Issue 3, p. 159). https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8030159
Zhao, R., Wang, Y., Li, X., Wang, Q., Qiu, R., & Liu, X. (2025). Psychological resilience and social anxiety in aphasia: the mediating role of interpersonal relationship perception. Current Psychology, 44(21), 17398–17410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-025-08155-6
